w.leagle.com/images/logo.png">
Leagle.com Leagle.com Leagle.com
Sign in
 

CRAKER v. UNITED STATES DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMIN.

No. 21-1055, No. 21-1323.

44 F.4th 48 (2022)

Dr. Lyle E. CRAKER, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION; Anne Milgram, in her official capacity as Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration, Respondents. Scottsdale Research Institute, Petitioner, v. United States Drug Enforcement Administration; Anne Milgram, in her official capacity as Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration; Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, Respondents.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

August 9, 2022.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Shane Pennington , with whom Vicente Sederberg LLP, Michael Perez , Perez Law, Alexandra H. Deal , Paik, Brewington & Deal, LLP, Matthew C. Zorn , and Yetter Coleman LLP were on brief, for petitioners.

Daniel Aguilar , Attorney, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, with whom Brian M. Boynton , Acting Assistant Attorney General, and Mark B. Stern , Attorney, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, were on brief, for respondents.

Before Barron, Chief Judge, Lynch and Kayatta, Circuit Judges.


Petitioners — botany professor Dr. Lyle Craker and clinical research company Scottsdale Research Institute (SRI) — challenge a rule promulgated by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) that sets the framework through which applicants may register to lawfully manufacture and cultivate cannabis for research...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases

    UNITED STATES v. COX | 580 F.2d 317 (1978) | 0f2d3171827 | Leagle.com
     

    UNITED STATES v. COX

    Nos. 77-1832, 77-1838 and 77-1945.

    580 F.2d 317 (1978)

    UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Jarrell COX, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Mary WOODY, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Irving Stewart WISE, a/k/a J. R. Wise, Appellant.

    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

    Decided July 14, 1978.

    Rehearing Denied August 4, 1978.


    Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

    Mayer Kanter, Sioux City, Iowa, for appellants Cox and Woody.

    Keith R. Strange, Sioux Falls, S. D., for appellant Wise.

    Robert D. Hiaring, Asst. U.S. Atty., Sioux Falls, S. D., for appellee; David V. Vrooman, U.S. Atty., Sioux Falls, S. D., on brief.

    Before HEANEY, BRIGHT and STEPHENSON, Circuit Judges.


    Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied August 4, 1978.

    STEPHENSON, Circuit Judge.

    This is a direct criminal appeal from a jury verdict of guilty.1 The defendants-appellants, Jarrell Cox, Mary Woody, and Irving Stewart Wise, were all found guilty on all three counts of an indictment. Count I of the indictment charged a conspiracy to commit a wire fraud, to transport fraudulently taken property in interstate commerce, and to sell...

    Let's get started

    Leagle.com

    Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
    Sign on now to see your case.
    Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

    • Updated daily.
    • Uncompromising quality.
    • Complete, Accurate, Current.

    Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

    Cited Cases

    • No Cases Found

    Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

    Citing Cases