1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 455 F.Supp.
  5. 455 F.Supp. 432 (1978)
 

HODOROWSKI v. BELL

No. 78-C-159.

455 F.Supp. 432 (1978)

Mary T. HODOROWSKI, Plaintiff, v. Wilford BELL and Rose Bedell, Defendants.

United States District Court, E. D. Wisconsin.

August 16, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mary T. Hodorowski, pro se.

Seymour Pikofsky of Franks & Pikofsky, Milwaukee, Wis., for Bell.

John D. Morrisey, Milwaukee, Wis., for Bedell.

DECISION and ORDER

MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge.

The defendant Wilford Bell has filed a motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on its merits. Alternatively, the defendant seeks dismissal of this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. If there were merit to the defendant's alternative motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, I would be obliged to address that motion in the first instance. Rule 12(h), Federal Rules...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases