Order affirmed.
HOFFMAN, J., dissented because there were sufficient issues of fact which, if the jury resolved them in appellant's favor, would create liability.
WATKINS, former P.J., did not participate in the consideration or decision...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.