WEITZMAN v. STEIN

No. 70 Civ. 4037 (LFM).

459 F.Supp. 400 (1978)

Saul WEITZMAN, Plaintiff, v. Sidney STEIN, Norman Rubinson and Albert Feiffer, Defendants.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

November 1, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Flaxman & Sulkow by Martin Sulkow, New York City, for plaintiff.

Sidney Feldshuh, New York City, for defendant Stein.

Feiner, Chernis, Curtis & Goldman by Stephen R. Hill, New York City, for defendant Feiffer.

Norman Rubinson, pro se.


OPINION

MacMAHON, District Judge.

After trial of this securities fraud action, we rendered judgment for the plaintiff, holding, inter alia, that his damages consisted of two Florida state court judgments entered against him by two brokerage houses, H. Hentz & Co. ("Hentz") and Dishey, Easton & Co. ("Dishey"). Weitzman v. Stein, 436 F.Supp. 895 (S.D.N.Y.1977). Because no proof was offered at trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases