The testimony of accomplices Bartlett, Berg and Eggleston as to the defendant's participation in the crime and the testimony of the nonaccomplice Hook as to the admission made by the defendant overwhelmingly establish the defendant's guilt. The testimony of Berg did not, as the defendant contends, constitute a rational basis for the submission to the jury of the lesser included offense of criminal trespass in the second degree (Penal Law, § 140.15). Berg testified that...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
