PAUL W. BROWN, J.
Four propositions of law are proferred in this appeal.
The first is that the showing of a single mug shot of appellant to the eyewitness violated appellant's due process rights and irretrievably tainted the identification. Appellant cites Simmons v. United States (1968),
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.