ZEE TOYS, INC. v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Docket Nos. 52977, 53695, 53306.

85 Cal.App.3d 763 (1978)

149 Cal. Rptr. 763

ZEE TOYS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Appellants. SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

October 25, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

John H. Larson, County Counsel, and James Dexter Clark, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendants and Appellants.

Baker, Ancel & Redmond, Baker, Ancel, Redmond & Hall, Gerald T. Manpearl, Thomas C. Corcovelos, Jeanne Denise Hansen, Loeb & Loeb, Frank M. Keesling, Andrew S. Garb, Thomas W. Henning, Jones, Hall & Arky and Ann K. Smith for Plaintiffs and Respondents.


OPINION

POTTER, Acting P.J.

These consolidated appeals are from summary judgments in two superior court actions which grant plaintiffs Zee Toys, Inc., and Formosa Plastics Group (U.S.A.), Inc. (Sup. Ct. No. C 179151) and Sears, Roebuck and Co. (Sup.Ct. No. C 191156) refunds of ad valorem taxes paid under protest. In the Zee case, the taxes had been collected for the benefit of defendants County of Los Angeles and City of Long Beach...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases