1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 579 P.2d
  5. 579 P.2d 269 (1978)
 

PURCELL v. CITY OF PORTLAND

579 P.2d 269 (1978)

34 Or.App. 485

Bard PURCELL, Respondent, v. CITY OF PORTLAND, Defendant, and Multnomah County, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 25, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin B. Vidgoff, Deputy County Counsel, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was George M. Joseph, County Counsel, Portland.

Robert K. Udziela, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Pozzi, Wilson & Atchison, Portland.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and THORNTON and JOHNSON, JJ.,

JOHNSON, Judge.

This is an action at law in contract alleging that Multnomah County and the City of Portland agreed to pay plaintiff certain contingent supplemental pension benefits as part of his compensation as Director of Public Safety for the county.1 The case was tried to the court and judgment was entered against the county for $15,752, together with a declaration that defendant pay plaintiff future supplemental benefits in the amount...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases