The order appealed from should be affirmed, without costs. The statutory language which we have previously interpreted as requiring a subscribing witness to a designating petition in all areas of the State to list his current assembly district (Matter of Vari v Hayduk,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF MORRIS v. HAYDUK
45 N.Y.2d 793 (1978)
In the Matter of Charles E. Morris, Appellant, v. Albert T. Hayduck et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of Westchester County, and Albert A. Capellini et al., Respondents.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued August 30, 1978.
Decided September 1, 1978.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur in memorandum.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.