PER CURIAM.
A.S., a juvenile, was charged by petition for delinquency with grand larceny. He brings this appeal from an order adjudicating him delinquent and placing him under the supervision of the Division of Youth Services. The sole question presented is whether the charge of grand larceny was supported by substantial, competent evidence.
We agree with appellant that there was not substantial, competent evidence to support a finding of grand larceny. However...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.