1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Mich.
  4. 83 Mich.
  5. 83 Mich. App. 732 (1978)
 

PEOPLE v. HEATWOLE

Docket No. 77-1565.

83 Mich. App. 732 (1978)

269 N.W.2d 283

PEOPLE v. HEATWOLE

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided June 5, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, William L. Cahalan, Prosecuting Attorney, Edward R. Wilson, Principal Attorney, Appeals, and Rita Chasting, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.

Harvey, Kruse & Westen, P.C. (by Paul Hynes), for defendant on appeal.

Before: BEASLEY, P.J., and BASHARA and D.C. RILEY, JJ.

BASHARA, J.

The majority adopts the statement of facts of the dissent. I hold for reversal in the full knowledge that Judge BEASLEY'S dissent is entirely logical and eminently sound.

However, unlike the dissent, we cannot differentiate the facts of the instant case from People v McGinnis, 402 Mich. 343; 262 N.W.2d 669 (1978). Frankly, I respectfully question the rationale of

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases