SMITH, Judge.
The primary contentions in this appeal from a theft-by-taking conviction are that the trial court erred in its handling of an accomplice/corroboration issue and in its handling of the sentencing hearing. We find no error and affirm.
1. There is no merit in the enumerations concerning whether a leading state witness was an accomplice of the appellant and, if so, whether this witness' testimony was corroborated as required by Code § 38-121...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
