PER CURIAM.
Defendant seeks review of the denial without evidentiary hearing of his motion to vacate, set aside or correct the sentence. Defendant's assertion that consecutive sentences imposed for the burglary and grand larceny were illegal since the offenses arose out of a single transaction is, as determined by the trial court, without merit. Estevez v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.