OTT, Judge.
The issue before us is whether the lower court erred in excluding the testimony of a certain defense witness. We hold that the testimony of that witness was relevant and should have been admitted. Accordingly, we reverse.
The information charged appellant — an osteopath — with violation of Chapter 893 Florida Statutes (1977) for allegedly delivering quantities of two controlled substances to undercover police officers not issued ...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
