PER CURIAM.
Appellant appeals his grand larceny conviction, claiming that a statement made by the prosecutor in his closing argument constituted an improper comment on his constitutional
The record reveals that the evidence against appellant was composed of (1) the testimony of a co-defendant who had turned State's evidence, and (2) the testimony of a Pensacola police...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.