Judgments affirmed and case remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5).
On the motion to suppress, defendants claimed that the warrant had been improperly executed because the officers secured entry when a co-occupant opened the door and let them in before the officers gave "notice of [their] authority and purpose" (see CPL 690.50, subd 1). On the facts here, we find that there had been sufficient compliance...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.