CONDOSTA v. CONDOSTA

No. 68-77.

395 A.2d 345 (1978)

Rosalie CONDOSTA v. Guido CONDOSTA

Supreme Court of Vermont.

Motion to Disqualify and Motion for Reargument Denied October 2, 1978.

Motion for Stay of Mandate Denied October 31, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Grussing, III, Brattleboro, for plaintiff.

Charles D. Carrington, Arlington, for defendant.

Guido Condosta, pro se.

Before BARNEY, C. J., and DALEY, LARROW, BILLINGS and HILL, JJ.


LARROW, Justice.

The defendant below appeals from a divorce judgment awarded his wife. The action was brought originally on the ground of intolerable severity, and an allegation, denominated "anticipatory," of six months separation without reasonable probability of resumption of the marital relationship. Defendant for the most part represented himself below, with the not unusual result that the docket entries alone, in the trial court, are some eight pages in length...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases