Judgment affirmed.
The crucial question is whether the evidence sustains the jury's verdict that the defendant was guilty of being an accomplice to the robbery by reason of his knowing participation as the driver of the getaway car (see Penal Law, § 20.00). In our opinion, there was ample evidence to sustain the jury's determination that the defendant was a knowing accomplice. The evidence established that the codefendants were seen entering the defendant's vehicle...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.