WEED v. BOARD OF REVISION OF FRANKLIN COUNTY

No. 77-429.

53 Ohio St. 2d 20 (1978)

WEED, APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF REVISION OF FRANKLIN COUNTY ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided January 18, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Thurlow Weed, pro se.

Mr. George C. Smith, prosecuting attorney, Mr. Gene Wetherholt and Mr. Frank A. Ray, for appellee.


Per Curiam.

Appellant's contention, in essence, is that Section 1, Article I of the Ohio Constitution, is paramount to all other provisions of the Ohio Constitution and precludes the taxation of his real property inasmuch as he has not consented to such taxation.

However, "[t]he power to tax is an attribute of sovereignty and in this state is included in the general legislative power which is conferred...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases