HARTFORD ACC. & INDEM. CO. v. GOOSSEN

Docket No. 52408.

84 Cal.App.3d 649 (1978)

148 Cal. Rptr. 784

HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. GLENN GOOSSEN, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

September 7, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Black & Caldwell and James E. Black for Defendant and Appellant.

Patterson, Ritner & Lockwood and William F. Ritner for Plaintiff and Respondent.


OPINION

KINGSLEY, Acting P.J.

Defendant appeals from an adverse judgment in an action for declaratory relief. We affirm the judgment.

Defendant, while riding on a motorcycle, was injured by a collision with an uninsured motorist. He claims to be entitled to indemnity under a policy issued by plaintiff to a man named Tench. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the insurer. We affirm.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases