1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 66 A.D.2d
  5. 66 A.D.2d 667 (1978)
 

PEOPLE v. BURGESS

66 A.D.2d 667 (1978)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Harry Burgess, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

December 5, 1978

The only error claimed on appeal is that two police officers testified that the eyewitness victim had identified the defendant as the perpetrator of the robbery and that this constituted "bolstering" under the rule of People v Trowbridge (305 N.Y. 471). The evidence and reference to it in the summation were not objected to. In any event, in our view, the error was harmless. The identification...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases