Judgment, as corrected, reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and proceeding dismissed on the merits.
The prorating of the household expenses by the State commissioner between the petitioner and her child was not arbitrary and capricious. Thus, the conclusion that each had a surplus over his or her "pro rata share of the needs" was proper, and the reasoning of Johnson v Harder (
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.