Proceeding dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as untimely for failure to institute the proceeding within 30 days after service of the order of the Human Rights Appeal Board, as required by section 298 of the Executive Law.
We note that the order of the board was supported by substantial evidence and that petitioner failed to make out even a prima facie case of discrimination (see New York Inst. of Technology v State Div. of Human Rights,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.