CRINNION v. THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA CO.


156 N.J. Super. 479 (1978)

384 A.2d 159

PATRICK CRINNION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 30, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Gerald D. Miller argued the cause on behalf of appellant (Messrs. Miller, Hochman, Meyerson, & Schaeffer, attorneys).

Mr. Alfred J. Hill argued the cause on behalf of respondent (Messrs. Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, attorneys).

Before Judges CONFORD, MICHELS and PRESSLER.


The opinion of the court was delivered by MICHELS, J.A.D.

Plaintiff Patrick Crinnion appeals from a summary judgment of the Chancery Division declaring that he was not entitled to credit for the 12 years he was employed by defendant The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company after age 65 in computing his yearly pension benefits under defendant's Employees' Retirement Plan ("Plan").

The facts are not in dispute. Plaintiff was employed by defendant from September...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases