WASHTENAW CTY. v. SALINE RIVER INTERCOUNTY DRAINAGE BD.

Docket Nos. 77-38, 77-39, 77-79, 77-80.

80 Mich. App. 550 (1978)

264 N.W.2d 53

WASHTENAW COUNTY v. SALINE RIVER INTERCOUNTY DRAINAGE BOARD CITY OF SALINE v. SALINE RIVER INTERCOUNTY DRAINAGE BOARD

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided January 5, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eliot G. Striar, for plaintiffs Washtenaw County, Catherine McClary and Meri Lou Murray.

John L. Etter, for plaintiffs Pittsfield Township and York Township.

Allan W. Grossman, for plaintiff City of Saline.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, and Harry G. Iwasko, Jr., and Henry J. Boynton, Assistants Attorney General, for defendant Stanley R. Quackenbush.

Drillock, Atkins, Schrope & Marcus, for defendants Saline River Intercounty Drainage Board and Augmented Drainage Board of the Saline River Drain.

Before: J.H. GILLIS, P.J., and BASHARA and H.L. HEADING, JJ.


BASHARA, J.

This is an appeal by defendants from an order of the trial court granting, sua sponte, a summary judgment for plaintiffs, enjoining defendants from establishing the Saline River as an intercounty drain. Although the judgment of the trial court rests upon a procedural peculiarity, we need not address that aspect of the case. The gravamen of the controversy is the interpretation of pertinent sections of the Drain Code of 1956. MCLA 280.1, et seq...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases