1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 588 P.2d
  5. 588 P.2d 36 (1978)
 

SUTHERLIN FABRICATION CO. v. LINCOLN CONST. CO.

No. 76-2445; SC 25601.

588 P.2d 36 (1978)

284 Or. 733

SUTHERLIN FABRICATION COMPANY, a Corporation, Respondent, v. LINCOLN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, William Link, Defendant.

Supreme Court of Oregon, Department 1.

Decided December 29, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dean Heiling, of Heiling & McIntosh, Roseburg, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant.

James H. Spence, of Spence, O'Neal & Banta, Roseburg, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.

Before DENECKE, C.J., and HOLMAN, HOWELL, and LENT, JJ.

HOWELL, Judge.

This is an action for recovery of the reasonable value of equipment constructed by plaintiff for defendant. The trial court, sitting without a jury, entered judgment in favor of plaintiff for $13,376.91, and defendant appeals.

Plaintiff is an Oregon corporation engaged in the business of constructing heavy equipment. Defendant is an Oregon corporation engaged in the business of rock crushing. The parties entered into a contract whereby plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases