Writ denied.
SUMMERS and MARCUS, JJ., would grant the writ.
TATE, J., concurs in denial, being under the belief that the Court of Appeal currently indicated that the applicant's remedy for recovery of the underlying obligation is by an independent suit, rather than a remand for amendment of the pleadings in the present suit. The present suit interrupted prescription on all claims arising out of the factual basis for such...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
