1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 582 F.2d
  5. 582 F.2d 25 (1978)
 

DOE v. STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA

No. 76-2894.

582 F.2d 25 (1978)

John DOE and Richard H. Foster, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, Michael E. Wald and David L. Frey, Jr., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

September 18, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard H. Foster (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Ronald W. Stovitz (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

Before MERRILL and TANG, Circuit Judges, and TAYLOR, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is from the judgment of the district court dismissing this action to enjoin disciplinary proceedings of the State Bar of California against appellant John Doe. Appellants contend that the disciplinary proceedings violate the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

After a careful review of the record and the briefs of counsel, it is our opinion that the trial judge correctly concluded...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases