1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 241 S.E.2d
  5. 241 S.E.2d 365 (1978)
 

STATE v. HODGES

No. 772SC797.

241 S.E.2d 365 (1978)

35 N.C. App. 328

STATE of North Carolina v. Marion Uriah HODGES, Jr.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

February 21, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Associate Atty. Kaye R. Webb, Raleigh, for the State.

W. B. Carter, Washington, and Clarence W. Griffin, Williamston, for defendant-appellant.

BRITT, Judge.

Defendant contends first that the court committed prejudicial error in sustaining the State's objections to his counsel's questions to him as to why he shot Harris. We find no merit in this contention.

This contention relates to Exceptions 4, 5 and 6. With respect to them, the record discloses:

Q. Mr. Hodges, why did you shoot Mr. Harris? A. Well, I was afraid of him and I knew he was going to hurt me. Objection of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases