LAUREL HILLS HOMEOWNERS ASSN. v. CITY COUNCIL

Docket No. 52606.

83 Cal.App.3d 515 (1978)

147 Cal. Rptr. 842

LAUREL HILLS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Appellants; 8941 MULHOLLAND DRIVE CORPORATION, Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

August 3, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Charles F. Palmer, Paul F. Cohen and Antonio Rossman for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Burt Pines, City Attorney, Claude E. Hilker and Jerome Montgomery, Assistant City Attorneys, for Defendants and Appellants.

Latham & Watkins and George A. Rice for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.


OPINION

COBEY, Acting P.J.

Petitioners, Laurel Hills Homeowners Association, Briarcliff Improvement Association, Susan Tyler, and Marvin E. Jacobs, appeal from a judgment denying their petition for a writ of mandate that would have required respondents, the City Council of Los Angeles, the city planning commission and the city advisory agency, to vacate their approvals of a subdivision (tentative tract 29033) proposed by the developer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases