1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 241 S.E.2d
  5. 241 S.E.2d 353 (1978)
 

PARRISH TIRE CO. v. MOREFIELD

No. 7721DC210.

241 S.E.2d 353 (1978)

35 N.C. App. 385

PARRISH TIRE COMPANY v. Robert E. Lee MOREFIELD, III.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

February 21, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

House & Blanco by Robert Talley, Winston-Salem, for plaintiff-appellant.

Yeager & Powell by Edward L. Powell, Winston-Salem, for defendant-appellee.

PARKER, Judge.

The note in suit was never transferred or negotiated, and we are here concerned only with the rights and obligations of the original parties. In determining these, we apply principles of law applicable to the interpretation and effect of contracts generally.

"Whenever a court is called upon to interpret a contract its primary purpose is to ascertain the intention of the parties at the moment of its execution." Lane v. Scarborough,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases