1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 21 Wn.
  5. 21 Wn. App. 566 (1978)
 

ANDREW v. KING COUNTY

No. 5685-1.

21 Wn. App. 566 (1978)

586 P.2d 509

OLEN V. ANDREW, ET AL, Respondents, v. KING COUNTY, ET AL, Respondents, RAGING RIVER MINING, INC., Appellant.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

October 16, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James R. Young, for appellant.

Smith, Brucker, Winn & Ehlert, Roger M. Leed, Christopher T. Bayley, Prosecuting Attorney, and Richard Elliott, Deputy, for respondents.

ANDERSEN, A.C.J.

FACTS OF CASE

On certiorari, the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County reversed the decision of the King County Board of Appeals and determined that the Raging River Quarry was not a legal nonconforming use permitted under the King County zoning code. The quarry owner appeals. We reverse and remand.

The Raging River Quarry, which is the subject of this action, is located adjacent to the Raging River and is between...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases