1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 573 F.2d
  5. 573 F.2d 1 (1978)
 

UNITED STATES v. HARTFORD-EMPIRE CO.

No. 76-2095.

573 F.2d 1 (1978)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HARTFORD-EMPIRE CO. et al., Defendants-Appellees, Maul Brothers, Inc., Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided April 11, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David M. Jones, Eastman, Stichter, Smith & Bergman, Toledo, Ohio, for appellant.

Bernard M. Hollander, Judgments and Judgment Enforcement Section, Thomas E. Kauper, Asst. Atty. Gen., Edward Lawson, Robert B. Nicholson, Wm. D. Coston, Antitrust Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for the United States.

John B. Spitzer, Marshall, Melhorn, Bloch & Belt, Toledo, Ohio, H. Richard Schumacher, Cahill, Gordon & Reindel, New York City, for Hartford-Empire Co.

Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and PECK and MERRITT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Maul Brothers, Inc. (hereinafter Maul) appeals from the denial of its motion to intervene in this antitrust action as a party defendant pursuant to Rule 24(a)(2) Fed.R.Civ.P. The United States filed the underlying action in this case in 1939 to break up an alleged conspiracy by defendants to divide markets in the glass container and glass making machinery industries, in part through the use of patents. In 1945, the Supreme Court affirmed the district court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases