1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.
  4. 482 Pa.
  5. 482 Pa. 58 (1978)
 

CURTIS v. REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, ETC.

482 Pa. 58 (1978)

393 A.2d 377

Dewey Lee CURTIS, Appellant, v. REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF the CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and William D. Glockner and Winifred M. Glockner.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided October 5, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arnold H. Rosenberg, Philadelphia, for appellant.

David S. Winston, Paul A. Cohen, Peter A. Galante, Philadelphia, for appellee, Redevelopment Authority.

Samuel Rappaport, Philadelphia, for appellees, William D. Glockner, et al.

Before O'BRIEN, ROBERTS, POMEROY, NIX, and LARSEN, JJ.

OPINION OF THE COURT

NIX, Justice.

This is an appeal1 from the order of the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania which reversed the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County sitting en banc. The controlling issue in this case is whether, under all the facts and circumstances, appellant was provided with notice of the taking sufficient to meet the requirements of due process. The Commonwealth Court held that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases