UNDERCOFLER, Presiding Justice.
Appellant was held in contempt for failure to comply with a provision of a divorce decree which he contends is a property settlement. He argues that the provision merely declares the rights of the parties and since the decree did not command performance he cannot be held in contempt. We affirm. Duke v. Smith,
...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
