ROWE v. DULUTH LAUNDRY

Nos. 48248, 48263.

272 N.W.2d 255 (1978)

Richard J. ROWE, Respondent, v. DULUTH LAUNDRY, et al., Relators. Charles E. KLEIN, Respondent, v. N. H. SANDBERG ERECTION COMPANY, et al., Relators.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

September 15, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lommen & Cole and Mark N. Stageberg, Minneapolis, for relator Duluth Laundry.

Van Eps & Gilmore and Michael Forde, Minneapolis, for N. H. Sandberg Erection Co.

John Wallraff, Comp. Atty., Minneapolis, for Rowe.

D. A. Hoops, Rochester, for Klein.

Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.


PER CURIAM.

These cases present the same issue — whether the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals correctly determined that Minn.St. 176.645 was applicable to increase retraining benefits to which the employees were entitled. One employer, N. H. Sandberg Erection Company, and its insurer seek review of a decision affirming a compensation judge's award of retraining benefits to employee Charles Klein in the amount of $145.33 per week. The other employer, Duluth...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases