DAVY v. MOSS

No. 4380-1.

19 Wn. App. 32 (1978)

573 P.2d 826

WALTER DAVY, ET AL, Appellants, v. RICHARD E. MOSS, ET AL, Defendants, GEORGIA TIMBREZA, Respondent.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

January 9, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Karr, Tuttle, Koch, Campbell, Mawer & Morrow, Charles A. Kimbrough, David D. Swartling, and Philip A. Talmadge, for appellants.

Steinberg & Steinberg and Jack Steinberg, for respondent.


WILLIAMS, J.

The question on this appeal is whether the trial court, in an action for a breach of contract, erred in refusing to allow to the prevailing party the reasonable attorney's fees called for in RCW 4.84. The answer depends upon the meaning of "action for damages." We reverse.

Pertinent sections of the statute are:

Notwithstanding any other provisions of chapter 4.84 RCW and RCW 12.20.060, in any action for damages where the amount...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases