BOYARIN v. NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY


75 N.J. 434 (1978)

383 A.2d 117

PETER BOYARIN AND BERNARD BOYARIN, T/A P & B HOLDING COMPANY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. HYMAN WEIDENFELD AND BARBARA WEIDENFELD, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 16, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Steven Pfeffer argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Matthews, Levin and Shea, attorneys).

Mr. Bernard M. Reilly argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Herbert I. Olarsch, attorney).


PER CURIAM.

The Appellate Division, in unreported opinions, affirmed the decisions of the Law Division granting summary judgment in favor of respondent substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division in Creek Ranch, Inc. v. New Jersey Turnpike Authority, 156 N.J.Super. 1 (1976). Appellants filed notices of appeal as of right with this Court by virtue of dissents in the Appellate Division...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases