LECHTER-SIEGEL v. DIST. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION

No. 12869.

395 A.2d 57 (1978)

Amy LECHTER-SIEGEL, Petitioner, v. DISTRICT UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD, Respondent.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided November 20, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R. Nathaniel Rackett, III, law student counsel (LS # 1933), with whom John P. Sizemore, Washington, D. C., supervising attorney, was on the brief, for petitioner.

D. Kevin Dugan, with whom Russell L. Carter and Bill L. Smith, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for respondent.

Before KELLY, NEBEKER and HARRIS, Associate Judges.


NEBEKER, Associate Judge:

This is a petition for review of the denial of unemployment benefits based on petitioner's inability to comply with the reporting requirements of the District Unemployment Compensation Act, D.C.Code 1973, § 46-309(d). Petitioner, otherwise eligible for benefits, was unable to fulfill the reporting requirements because she had moved to Belgium. Although D.C.Code 1973, § 46-316(g), authorizes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases