1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 242 S.E.2d
  5. 242 S.E.2d 196 (1978)
 

HAZARD v. HAZARD

No. 7715DC480.

242 S.E.2d 196 (1978)

35 N.C. App. 668

Fred HAZARD v. Margaret C. HAZARD.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

March 21, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Battle & Bayliss, by F. Gordon Battle, William H. Bayliss, Chapel Hill, and Dalton Loftin, Hillsborough, for plaintiff appellee.

Manning, Jackson, Osborn & Frankstone, by David R. Frankstone, Chapel Hill, for defendant appellant.

ARNOLD, Judge.

Defendant argues that she should have been allowed to attack the consent judgment rendered in an earlier action between the two parties. Her argument fails. The case of Becker v. Becker, 262 N.C. 685, 138 S.E.2d 507 (1964), presented a similar argument, and that case controls our decision here. In Becker, the Supreme Court followed the well settled principle of law in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases