1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 158 N.J.
  5. 158 N.J. Super. 269 (1978)
 

STATE v. PORRO

158 N.J. Super. 269 (1978)

385 A.2d 1258

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ALFRED A. PORRO, JR., AND THOMAS JONES, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 13, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Bernard L. Segal argued the cause for appellant Alfred A. Porro, Jr., pro hac vice (Mr. Michael A. Querques, attorney).

Mr. James D. Checki, attorney for appellant Thomas Jones, relied on argument of Mr. Bernard L. Segal (Messrs. Checki & Politan, attorneys).

Mr. James Mayer, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Roger W. Breslin, Jr., Bergen County Prosecutor, attorney).

Before Judges HALPERN, LARNER and KING.

The opinion of the court was delivered by KING, J.A.D.

These defendants were indicted by a Bergen County grand jury in October 1975 for the crimes of conspiracy and misconduct in office. They brought timely motions at the trial level challenging the array of grand jurors. The motions were denied by the trial judge for the reasons stated in his reported opinion at 152 N.J.Super. 259

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases