1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 243 S.E.2d
  5. 243 S.E.2d 172 (1978)
 

CURRENCE v. HARDIN

No. 7726DC477.

243 S.E.2d 172 (1978)

Samuel Q. CURRENCE v. Faye Alice HARDIN.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

April 18, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul J. Williams, Charlotte, for plaintiff-appellant.

Caudle, Underwood & Kinsey, by C. Ralph Kinsey, Jr., Charlotte, for defendant-appellee.

BRITT, Judge.

By his first assignment of error, plaintiff contends the trial court erred in not allowing Dr. Logan to testify with respect to his chiropractic diagnosis of plaintiff. We find no merit in this contention.

In North Carolina chiropractors are allowed to testify as experts in their special field as defined and limited by statute. Allen v. Hinson, 12 N.C. App. 515, 183 S.E.2d 852

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases