STATE v. BURGUN

Nos. 77-1144, 77-1154, 77-1155, 77-1279.

56 Ohio St. 2d 354 (1978)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. BURGUN, APPELLANT. THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. BAYLESS, APPELLANT. THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. TUROSO, APPELLANT. THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. KRUTE, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 7, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ms. Almeta A. Johnson, police prosecutor, Bertsch, Edelman & Fludine Co., L. P. A., and Mr. Bruce A. Taylor, for appellee.

Messrs. Berkman, Gordon, Kancelbaum & Levy, Mr. Bernard A. Berkman and Mr. Joshua J. Kancelbaum, for appellants.


CELEBREZZE, J.

I.

The appellants have raised seven propositions of law. The first four propositions apply to all four appeals. Propositions No. 5 and 6 apply only to State v. Burgun, case No. 77-1144, and likewise proposition No. 7 is concerned solely with State v. Krute, case No. 77-1279.

In their first proposition of law, appellants contend that the definition of obscenity...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases