FROH v. MILWAUKEE MEDICAL CLINIC, S.C.

No. 77-622.

85 Wis.2d 308 (1978)

270 N.W.2d 83

FROH, and husband, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MILWAUKEE MEDICAL CLINIC, S.C., and others Defendants-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District I.

Decided August 16, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiffs-appellants the cause was submitted on the briefs of Mulcahy & Wherry S.C., with Carl L. Ricciardi of counsel, of Milwaukee.

For the defendants-respondents the cause was submitted on the briefs of Arnold, Murray, O'Neill & Schimmel, with Robert C. Watson of counsel, of Milwaukee.

Before DECKER C.J., CANNON P.J., and MOSER J.


MOSER, J.

The issue is whether the trial court committed prejudicial error in refusing to instruct the jury on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur.

[1]

The two elements of res ipsa loquitur that must be present before the application of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur are: (1) the accident must be of a kind which ordinarily does not occur in the absence of someone's negligence; (2) that it must be caused by an agency or instrumentality...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases