1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 80 Cal.App.3d
  5. 80 Cal.App.3d 309 (1978)
 

LEHMAN v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Docket No. 41338.

80 Cal.App.3d 309 (1978)

145 Cal. Rptr. 493

GODFREY LEHMAN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

April 25, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Robert B. Farrell and Carr Smulyan & Hartman for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Thomas M. O'Connor, City Attorney, and B. Timothy Murphy, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

SCOTT, Acting P.J.

Godfrey Lehman appeals from the judgment of dismissal following the sustaining of a demurrer by respondent City and County of San Francisco to his complaint, which alleges six causes of action against respondent for the separate violations under both state and federal law of his right to privacy, freedom of association and due process.1 For the purpose of the present appeal respondent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases