COM. v. HABERMAN


257 Pa.Super. 127 (1978)

390 A.2d 279

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant, v. Ruth Ellen HABERMAN, and David Andrew Ritenour, Appellees.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided July 12, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles W. Johns, Assistant District Attorney, with him Robert E. Colville, District Attorney, Pittsburgh, for Com., appellant.

H. David Rothman, Pittsburgh, with him Charles F. Scarlata, Pittsburgh, for appellees.

Before WATKINS, President Judge, and JACOBS, HOFFMAN, CERCONE, PRICE, VAN der VOORT and SPAETH, JJ.


CERCONE, Judge:

Ruth Haberman and David Ritenour were charged with violations of the Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act as the result of a search of the residence of Ruth Haberman. The search was conducted pursuant to a warrant issued on the basis of information received from a confidential informant. The lower court's order suppressing the evidence gathered in the search triggered this Commonwealth appeal.1

The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases