1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 241 S.E.2d
  5. 241 S.E.2d 132 (1978)
 

ERVIN v. TURNER

No. 7719DC234.

241 S.E.2d 132 (1978)

35 N.C. App. 265

Willis B. ERVIN et al. v. Baxter E. TURNER et ux.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

February 7, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ketner & Snider by Glenn E. Ketner, Jr., and Robert S. Rankin, Jr., Salisbury, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Carlton, Rhodes & Thurston by Gary C. Rhodes, Salisbury, for defendant-appellee.

HEDRICK, Judge.

The plaintiffs contend that summary judgment for the feme defendant was improper because plaintiffs raised a genuine issue of material fact in their pleadings and affidavits in opposition to the feme defendant's motion.

It is elementary that for a valid contract to exist it is required that there be a meeting of the minds of the parties as to all essential terms, which "`must be definite and certain...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases