1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 19 Wn.
  5. 19 Wn. App. 334 (1978)
 

HOPPER v. HEMPHILL

No. 4596-1.

19 Wn. App. 334 (1978)

575 P.2d 746

RUTH M. HOPPER, Individually and as Administratrix, Respondent, v. JOHN HEMPHILL, ET AL, Appellants.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

February 27, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wendells, Froelich, Power & Lakefish, Herbert I. Lakefish, and Francis R. Rudolph, for appellants.

McMullen, Brooke, Knapp & Grenier and Robert J. Grenier, for respondent.

ANDERSEN, J..

FACTS OF CASE

At issue is when the statute of limitations commences running on a demand obligation.

The facts as found by the trial court are these.

June 30, 1969. William R. Hopper (Hopper) loaned his friend John Hemphill (Hemphill) $10,000. Nothing was put in writing and their oral agreement was that the obligation was repayable on demand and would bear interest. March 31, 1972...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases