CASTROLL v. TOWNSHIP OF FRANKLIN


161 N.J. Super. 190 (1978)

391 A.2d 544

HARRY E. CASTROLL ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. TOWNSHIP OF FRANKLIN ET AL, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 24, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas J. Cafferty, attorney for appellants.

Norris, McLaughlin & Marcus, P.C., attorneys for respondent (Mr. Richard A. Norris on the brief).

Before Judges ALLCORN, HORN and FURMAN.


PER CURIAM.

A review of the record in this case makes plain that plaintiffs-developers completely failed to establish any special reasons within the contemplation of subsection (d) of N.J.S.A. 40:55-39, which would warrant or justify the recommendation or grant of the requested use variance sought by them. Likewise, the proofs were deficient in establishing fulfillment of the negative criteria. Such were also the conclusions of the municipal governing body...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases