1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 156 N.J.
  5. 156 N.J. Super. 182 (1978)
 

CRIFASI v. GOVERNING BODY OF BOROUGH OF OAKLAND

156 N.J. Super. 182 (1978)

383 A.2d 736

JACQUES CRIFASI AND EDWARD VANDERBECK, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS, v. GOVERNING BODY OF THE BOROUGH OF OAKLAND AND JAMES MULCAHY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS AND CROSS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 1, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Alfred J. Villoresi argued the cause for defendants-appellants and cross-respondents (Messrs. Villoresi and Buzak, attorneys).

Mr. Malcolm Blum argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents and cross-appellants (Messrs. Carlton & Blum, attorneys).

Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General, filed a brief as amicus curiae on behalf of the State of New Jersey (Mr. Stephen Skillman, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Mr. Larry Filler, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).

Before Judges LYNCH, BISCHOFF and KOLE.

The opinion of the court was delivered by LYNCH, P.J.A.D.

Defendants appeal from a judgment of the Law Division, reported at 151 N.J.Super. 98 (1977), which held that the appointment of defendant James Mulcahy to fill a vacancy in the Oakland Borough Council at a regularly scheduled work session of that body on May 4, 1977 was invalid because it violated the Open Public Meetings Act, N.J.S.A. 10:4-6 et seq. ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases